Contact Us

Interested? Intrigued? Something to report?

Feel free to get in touch with us.

Concept, Organization, Back-end Bugs

Reach out to Tim Anglade via email or twitter.

Design, Front-end Bugs

Send your queries to Stefano J. Attardi
(Check out his website while you're at it!)

City-specific question

Please talk to your local organizers instead. There's a link to their email address on the About page.

8========D~~~

This one’s for you, Cliff.

Don’t forget to lean into it.

Benchmarking Cloud Serving Systems with YCSB

by Brian F. Cooper & al.

While the use of MapReduce systems (such as Hadoop) for large scale data analysis has been widely recognized and studied, we have recently seen an explosion in the number of systems developed for cloud data serving. These newer systems address “cloud OLTP” applications, though they typically do not support ACID transactions. Examples of systems proposed for cloud serving use include BigTable, PNUTS, Cassandra, HBase, Azure, CouchDB, SimpleDB, Voldemort, and many others. Further, they are being ap- plied to a diverse range of applications that differ consider- ably from traditional (e.g., TPC-C like) serving workloads. The number of emerging cloud serving systems and the wide range of proposed applications, coupled with a lack of apples- to-apples performance comparisons, makes it difficult to un- derstand the tradeoffs between systems and the workloads for which they are suited. We present the Yahoo! Cloud Serving Benchmark (YCSB) framework, with the goal of fa- cilitating performance comparisons of the new generation of cloud data serving systems. We define a core set of benchmarks and report results for four widely used systems: Cassandra, HBase, Yahoo!’s PNUTS, and a simple sharded MySQL implementation. We also hope to foster the devel- opment of additional cloud benchmark suites that represent other classes of applications by making our benchmark tool available via open source. In this regard, a key feature of the YCSB framework/tool is that it is extensible—it supports easy definition of new workloads, in addition to making it easy to benchmark new systems.

Difficulty rating:

Annotated Versions

None yet.

Upcoming Discussions

None yet.